Your sites use AI.
Can every one of them prove they govern it?
When the carrier adds an AI question at renewal, it doesn’t land on one desk — it lands on every site you manage, every renewal cycle.
More than 4 in 5 U.S. physicians now use AI in practice (AMA, 2026), yet few have any governance framework in place. Standard-form AI exclusion endorsements are now available to every malpractice carrier in the country, and carrier renewal questionnaires increasingly ask about AI directly. State AI laws carry penalties up to $200,000 per violation — and apply across state lines through telehealth.
For a management organization, that isn’t one exposure — it’s every site × every carrier × every renewal date. And when site 12 answers “no AI in clinical workflows” while site 31 describes the same scribe the platform deployed at both, the portfolio has created a written record that contradicts itself.
Certifying your sites against one independent standard means every practice answers the carrier’s AI question from the same documented governance — not from memory, and not forty different ways across your own portfolio.
Independent third-party validation holds up where self-assessment doesn’t — in litigation, regulatory inquiry, carrier disputes, and PE due diligence. Site-by-site certificates are the documented proof the platform governed AI responsibly.
Every certified site receives its scored governance assessment report, site-specific policies and patient-facing AI disclosure templates, a carrier letter pack for renewal, and a digitally verifiable certification with 12-month validity.
Start with a conversation about your portfolio — sites, specialties, states. Judge the deliverables on real sites before any platform-wide commitment.