Legal Updates · Texas

Texas TRAIGA: What Healthcare Practices Should Know

The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (HB 149) took effect January 1, 2026, and — because of telehealth — it reaches far beyond practices with a Texas address. Here is what it does, in plain English.

Facts on this page were verified against primary and secondary sources between July 7 and July 17, 2026, and are reviewed on a recurring weekly schedule.

Educational information only — not legal advice. Sentinel Risk Group is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or legal opinions. This page summarizes publicly available statutes and regulatory materials for general governance education. Laws change frequently; confirm current requirements with qualified legal counsel in your jurisdiction.

What TRAIGA does

In force · Jan 1, 2026

TRAIGA — Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (HB 149)

Tex. Bus. & Com. Code · Enforced by the Texas Attorney General only · No private right of action

TRAIGA is a general-purpose AI governance statute with direct healthcare application. For practices, the core provisions are two: providers using AI in care or treatment must disclose it to patients, and the statute prohibits manipulative and discriminatory uses of AI systems.

Penalties are tiered, up to $200,000 per uncurable violation. Curable violations carry lower penalties and a cure period; uncurable ones do not. Enforcement belongs exclusively to the Texas Attorney General — TRAIGA creates no private lawsuit right, which distinguishes it from laws like Tennessee's SB 1580.

In force · Sep 1, 2025

The companion law: Texas SB 1188

Enforced by the Texas Medical Board / AG

SB 1188 requires that AI used in a diagnostic capacity be disclosed, operates in the Texas Medical Board licensure context, and adds provisions on where health-records data may be located. Where both statutes apply to the same conduct, the combined exposure across the two laws can reach up to $450,000 per violation.

Why non-Texas practices are covered

The practice of medicine occurs where the patient is physically located during the encounter — not where your office is. A Texas resident seen in person at your Florida office is governed by Florida law for that visit. But when that patient returns home and you conduct a telehealth follow-up while they are physically in Texas, TRAIGA applies to that encounter. Any practice conducting even occasional telehealth visits with patients located in Texas is operating inside TRAIGA's reach for those visits.

The NIST framework connection

TRAIGA builds in recognition for documented governance: practices following the NIST AI Risk Management Framework receive statutory protection against TRAIGA penalties. That makes a documented, framework-aligned AI governance program not just good practice but a recognized statutory defense posture in Texas.

What a governance response looks like

From a governance standpoint — not legal advice — practices touching Texas patients generally work through questions like these:

  • Disclosure: Do patients receive clear notice when AI is used in their care, treatment, or diagnosis — and is that notice documented?
  • Inventory: Do you know every AI tool in the workflow (scribes, coding, scheduling, chatbots, decision support), so nothing is undisclosed by omission?
  • Framework alignment: Is your AI use mapped to the NIST AI Risk Management Framework — the posture TRAIGA itself recognizes?
  • Telehealth mapping: Do you know which encounters involve patients physically located in Texas?

Our free 7-question risk assessment shows where a practice stands on exactly these dimensions.

Know where your practice stands

See how these laws map to your practice in 7 questions.

Take the Free Risk Assessment → Questions? Contact us with any inquiries.